Skip to main content

what lies behind the curtain

Populism can work but only when it is backed by the gravitas to truly want to make a difference.

Donald Trump pretends to espouse the populism of real change while Bernie Sanders, who truly wants it, swims against the current of capitalist orthodoxy. The latter captured the intellectuals and the youth vote while the former managed to dupe rightfully disgruntled blue collar white voters who have innocently done themselves a huge disservice.

But then in this last election the alternative to Trump was less than stellar.

Being led down the garden path is not a new concept but it has rarely been so flagrantly devoid of camouflage as it is today. I sit in bewilderment of how the incompetence of this administration doesn’t appear to stir into action an approriate response. This until I remember that many people are plugged into their own echo chambers or are easy prey for being bamboozled.

The populism of 20th century European despots like Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin worked for a limited time on a population that would discover an uglier truth lurking underneath. That this took time had much to do with that era's limitation in the flow of real information. Today we counteract with lightning speed data from faux news sites like Breitbart in an age where even mainstream media reporters need to tread lightly to not rock the boat of their corporate bosses.

Still, I can't help but be optimistic because I am seeing glimmers of a grass roots movement taking shape. The model of greed and consumerism that kept people distracted for so long might just be defeated by a youth culture that is far more likely to look behind the curtain. If they haven't done so already, the truth they will find there is that we are not so far removed from the days of serfdom as we would like to think.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…