Skip to main content

call me a cynic

The Canadian Senate was presented with a proposed bill C-16 which would update the Canadian Human Rights act to include the terms "gender identity" and "gender expression"

After the hearing, Marni Panas who was there testifying before a committee in order to defend these changes said this:

"That's the underlying bias that really perpetuates this debate, that transgender women aren't truly women. That fact is I'm real," she said. "Let me assure you, somebody doesn't come out as a transgender woman for privilege. It comes at a great cost. I've lost my parents. I'm going through a divorce."

Marni had thus far managed to keep her marriage and family together. Well now it appears that this is about to change and it is not so surprising to me for it is just not an obvious thing for a genetic woman to accept and certainly less so when the transgender partner actually transitions. I know of no marriages where the trans person has undergone a transition and the woman is truly okay with that outcome. I am not saying they don’t exist mind you just that I do not know of any.

So as disappointing as that must be for Marni she should not be surprised given she was bucking the statistics. At least I hope she continues to have a working relationship with her former spouse so that they can cooperate in raising their son.

Her great work for the transgender community may blossom even more now and her wife will hopefully have a chance at life with a cisgender man.

I have come to that point where being truly myself is more important than trying to be someone I am not in order to fit someone into my life. Perhaps this will be a positive thing for Marni in the long run.

So call me a cynic but I wasn't that surprised with the outcome.


Marni Panas

Comments

  1. Call me a cynic, but I find the notion that marriages must survive anything a tad pathological. As Dan Savage opined, there is something wrong with a culture whose only understanding of a successful relationship as one in which one of the partners does at the end.

    I was I a relationship (post transition) for 7 years. People kept saying, "Gosh, I'm sorry. That's a long time for things not to work out." Curious. What not work out? I gave love. I received love. I am a better person for having that relationship. My ex partner will always be a part of me, and I treasure that.

    I'm not saying I wasn't sad, or that it was easy to decide we needed to separate. I was devastated, and cling to the relationship probably longer than I should have. But I am no longer in it, and that's okay. I grieved appropriately, and look back with fondness.

    If couples want to give a marriage a shot as one partner transitions sex or gender, by all means! It's just that it's okay - and I mean really okay - for either partner to say it's not going to work, and to move on. That does not diminish the reality or the nature of the love that brought the couple together in the first place. In fact, that love might be one of the reasons one partner was able to come to terms with and come out about their gender issues. If that's the case, consider the relationship a success of its own kind.

    Everyone transitions somehow. Everything ends, even our lives. Our relationships should be judged by how we helped one another experience love, how we helped one another grow.

    Whether Marni finds a man, a woman, a non-binary person, or nobody, she has herself. I wish her happiness in whatever form it comes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The older I get the more agree with your viewpoint. We have life experiences and they help form us whether positive or negative. The gift of yourself is the biggest gift you can receive and sometimes that requires growth through some pain.

      I like the way you think Caryn...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…