Skip to main content

Shapiro speaks

Ben Shapiro belongs to that new group of young and brash conservatives who think they know everything because they can rattle off a few skewed statistics and quote references in front of a college audience.

If you watch this video you will see how he completely misunderstands what transgender people are trying to do which is fundamentally deal with their dysphoria. They are perfectly aware that they were not born as their target sex and also understand that what some of them go through is a gender role transition in order to quiet the noise in their head so they can lead normal and prosperous lives.

But Shapiro thinks we are all stupid and continues to press the point that transgender people are confused about their situations even having the gall to suggest that the 40% suicide attempt rate is not linked to societal rejection which it most certainly is. However the fact it drops dramatically in homes where these kids are accepted and loved instead of rejected wouldn't fit well with his right wing ideology.

Neither his lack of style or content win him any points or converts and his speaking rapidly and emphatically in order to disarm his questioners is a ploy to keep them unbalanced. He wouldn't fare well against a more educated and prepared opponent.

You also won't get people like Ben Shapiro to offer any intelligent or useful commentary about how to treat transgender people because that is not within his sphere of interest. His blunt force pronouncements about how forcing the rest of society to call a transgender woman or man by the proper pronouns is more what he is after and like Canadian professor Jordan Peterson they both stand their ground and use conservative ideology to repress a tiny fragment of the population presumably to save our societies from moral ruin or from political correctness gone mad. Note how he calls it a transgender movement as if there were a grand conspiracy afoot.

He gets hung up on biology and genitals because he is not interested in the subtleties of the subject matter.

It might not have occurred to an obnoxious person like Shapiro that transgender people have been around for millennia and need to fit in somewhere. By treating them with a modicum of dignity and respect you only elevate yourself as well but unfortunately good manners or good intent are not among his strong points...


  1. "Ben Shapiro belongs to that new group of young and brash conservatives who think they know everything because they can rattle off a few skewed statistics and quote references in front of a college audience."

    Heh, no. They just think they know everything period. There is no because.

    ". . . Shapiro thinks we're all stupid, and continues to press the point that transgender people are confused . . . "

    We're not confused. We're confusing to him. And to many non-hostile members of society, to be fair. But the hostile ones are determined to bounce that confusion back onto us. The confusion hurts,

    To wit, "his blunt force pronouncements about . . . forcing the rest of society" to acknowledge us with preferred pronouns. Because, you know, well, asking him to conform to something he just can't is cruel.

    Ahh, the coopting of victimhood. A classic among the conservative ideologue's memetic scams.

    The irony tickles. Don't waste any moral energy being perturbed by the likes of Ben Shapiro. That's exactly what they want, and the "peaceful" way left for them to "win." ;-)

    1. in the end what he thinks is irrelevant anyway since trans people aren't going away just for him and society is finding ways to grapple with that reality. He is just part of the frustrated alt-right sour grapes...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…