Skip to main content

a private matter

So Caitlyn Jenner has had gender reassignment surgery. Somehow she still looks the same and whether this occurred or not it changes nothing for the rest of us. Yet the speculation kept the tabloid media machine humming.

Has our opinion of her now changed as a consequence?

This interest in genitalia is coming from a curious public that barely comprehends what being transgender is all about because they have never questioned their own identity. It makes sense that it should reside between the ears and as transgender woman Julia Serano states:

“These are problems trans people often have to deal with in our day to day lives, if they haven’t had surgery, there’s something wrong with them.”

To which she adds:

“The most important factor that affects someone’s experience of gender is whether people perceive us as male or female and how they treat us and outside of the bedroom, it is very rare that a person’s genitals come into those split-second judgments one makes countless times a day”

It took me years to understand this distinction because as part of my refusal to accept myself I had bought into the idea that gender identity is only about physical sex. Those conservatives who argue along biological lines are suddenly stumped when the issue of intersex people come up who themselves must decide where they reside on the gender spectrum. The only possible answer is that this identification resides in the mind.

The fact is that transgender people know they are different from a very young age; long before any decisions about how to proceed are made.

Among the estimated 0.6% of the world that is transgender, it is a minority who choose to have gender reassignment. It is a private decision which should be respected and is as unique as each individual.

As part of the acceptance process of welcoming transgender people into society should be the idea that what their genitals look like is entirely a private matter.


  1. "The most important factor that affects someone's experience of gender is whether people perceive us as male or female, and how they treat us, and outside the bedroom, it is very rare that a person's genitals come into those split second judgments one makes countless times a day."

    I gotta hand it to Ms. Serano. I've always found her quite clever. But I think she's missing something.

    It's just not true that genitals "do not come into those split-second judgments." They are part and parcel of those split-second judgments in our culture. It is part of what people presume upon making those judgments, and to a certain extent, what we presume people are *communicating* about themselves. Perhaps as we evolved we started covering ourselves for various purposes, and we needed a way to communicate what was no longer visibly obvious?

    And as trans people, we are throwing a wrench into the gears of that communication. It startles even the most friendly potential allies as they try to understand us, and I do not begrudge them honest curiosity.

    The truth in Ms. Serano's observation is that even if people incorrectly infer how a person's body is shaped, they have not incorrectly perceived that *person.* We are communicating *who* we are, and we are not lying.

    Certainly, I think it's appropriate for any individual to say they would prefer the world not to have a conversation about the precise configuration of their genitals. (This seems strikingly awkward for trans and cis folk alike.) But if a celebrity would like to further the conversation by sharing their decision to have or not to have genital surgery, I think that's good.

    Though I would personally prefer that celebrity not be our community's village idiot. ;-)

    1. Touche on Caitlyn Jenner and as she also carries that awful Kardashian clan around like a yolk it doesn't help her cause. I would have preferred a better spokesperson and yet she shows us we are just as flawed as anyone else.

      I remember when Jennifer Boylsn first came out I didn't like her and still don't for different reasons. There's something of a haughty air that disturbs me. Oh well....


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…

looking past cross gender arousal

Jack’s latest Crossdreamers post got me thinking about cross gender arousal and how it could be avoided; also whether it even matters. This with particular focus on the inability to relate of someone on the outside looking in.

You see, sexuality is a very complicated thing to begin with and when you then add gender identity ambiguity it becomes a recipe to really confuse someone.

So imagine that you are a little boy who identifies as a girl but then along comes puberty and short circuits everything by having the sex you identify with also be the sex you are attracted to. For in essence this is what happens to all all male to female gender dysphoric trans persons who are attracted to women.

So I ask myself: can I imagine a scenario where this inherent contradiction would not produce sexual confusion? The answer is that I cannot.

I am in the unique position, like many of you, to have experienced an early identification with the feminine become sexualized later on. This brought confusion…

understanding the erotic component

I have written about crossed wires before in two separate posts. The idea is that one cannot pass through puberty and the development of sexual feelings for females and not have your pre-existing gender dysphoria be impacted through your psychosexual development. The hormone responsible for your libido is testosterone which is present in much stronger concentration in males and is why gynephilics are most likely to experience erotic overtones as the conflict between romantic external feelings and their pull towards the feminine become permanently intertwined.

Because I came from a deeply religious family where sex was not discussed much at all, I grew up with little access to information and was very much ignorant of matters relating to the subject. With no firsthand experience in intercourse until I married I was then faced with the reality that my ability to perform sexually had been deeply impacted by my dysphoric feelings. This began years of turmoil and self-deprecating thoughts …