Skip to main content

my brother's keeper

I recently watched a debate between The Young Turks’ Cenk Uygur and Ben Shapiro. It was supposed to be a friendly one between the American left and right.

At one point Shapiro said something revealing and tipped his hand. While discussing health care he said he didn’t want to be restrained by a system that kept him from doing what he wanted and getting the service he and his family deserved. He said he didn’t care about anyone else’s situation. Cenk responded that he could always supplement single payer with his own elective services if he could afford it but at least people wouldn’t get kicked off the insurance grid and potentially die.

But that wasn't what struck me.

American individualism worked well under a system when taxes were much higher like the 1950’s and 1960’s when there was a prosperous middle class with strong family units and community ties. As the social fabric has begun to dissolve that individualism has led to selfishness and disdain for those who aren’t part of my family. Part of that can be explained through the increasing diversification of society via immigration from place like the Middle East and Mexico which has built mistrust among many Americans.

Regardless, someone like Shapiro does not subscribe to bolstering the social safety net because he is a small government social conservative who repeats the same mantra. Yet in other nations it has been proven that taking a less capitalist approach works better overall. The caveat is to have the goal of seeing the entire society prosper without stiffling individual achievement by keeping it within reasonable measures. Ostensibly it means leaning a little more towards collectivism than individualism.

This type of thinking is heresy for a died in the wool conservative who erroneously believes that if free markets are allowed to operate unencumbered everything will take care of itself which is patently false. That ship sailed with the Reagan era and companies today hide their profits in offshore accounts and manufacture in places like Bangladesh paying meagre wages to foreign workers.

Shapiro also doesn’t care that corporations don’t have a conscience and following his natural line of conservative principles to their logical conclusion would result in societal chaos and collapse. Interesting viewpoint for a man who wears his Yarmulke everywhere he goes. I wonder how he reconciles religious principles with his politics.

Today we even have the 'prosperity evangelicals' who actually believe that if you pray hard enough God will bring you monetary wealth. I guess they must have been reading a different version of the Bible where the meek shall inherit the wealth.

With the global income gap only getting bigger each year, particularly in the United States, something has to give somewhere.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…