Skip to main content

rediscovering justice

A two party system is not helping America. This is what has encouraged the hardening of opinion and reinforced extreme thinking on both sides which only serves to gel an outright hatred.

In the past the gridlines were drawn a little differently and a rural south was mostly democrat and racist while northern democrats thought differently. Republicans were the party of Lincoln and emancipation so there was a crossover of ideas that permitted a more balanced political landscape. Contrast this with the red and blue state polarization by social wedge issue that threatens to fracture the country in half.

I am not American and yet my antipathy for Republicans and their extremism runs high. I can only imagine what some passionate patriots feel about what is happening to their own country and one only needs to read the comments left below a political YouTube video to see the vitriol first hand.

These are dangerous times for a country that were it not for fundamental principles sewn into its constitution would be potentially tumbling into fascism with its current administration. Trump may only be a mean spirited imbecile but he is surrounded by a cabal that is more dangerous than he is.

I still have faith that America can survive this presidency and recover some of its founding values but its most pressing need is to rediscover its appetite for fairness and close an income gap that threatens to undo the social peace; the kind of fairness that existed during the time of FDR.

The unbridled capitalist experiment failed and it's time to go home again.


  1. "A two party system is not helping America. This is what has encouraged the hardening of opinion and reinforced extreme thinking on both sides which only serves to gel an outright hatred."

    I believe the two-party system has served us well as it provides a way to collect opinions, needs, and beliefs into what is, presumably, a collective position to choose between at the polls. The system is far from perfect but its worked pretty well. Of late the system has fallen into disarray due to many things, including the emergence of the global market, technological change that threatens the status quo and has swamped individuals and businesses, and certainly, power-hungry and corrupt individuals bending the system to their will.

    Times change and people do too. As you pointed out, during Lincoln's time I would likely have been a proud Republican. I think it's crisis like the one we're in now that will wake up the populace into facing many realities. It's risky to wait and hope for this but I'm not sure what else we can do.

    1. the two party system also locks you into 1 of only 2 choices which in this case have become storage houses for the extreme right and moderate left. Your left isn't very far left compared to other countries which I also think is disturbing. You now have a radical right with a corporate left that has been bought by corporate interests. Not very healthy I'm afraid.

    2. I don't see what the alternative would be. In fact, it's a de facto two-party system, as we do have at least two others that I can think of. Theoretically at least, we get to go through a selection process whereby we nominate the "best choice" for each party, and then they go toe to toe. I'm sure you're aware of all that.

      Maybe it's a failure of democracy. Or maybe it's a failure of the people to adapt. Certainly it's a failure of the politicians and the wealthy to so blatantly stack the deck for their interests.

      I hate to think it's The Decline and Fall of the American Empire but it may well be. It's a mess, that's for sure something we all agree on.

  2. Under Duverver's Law, duopoly party systems tend to emerge from first-pat-the-post, winner-takes-all, single member districting systems - which the United States has. Nothing officially forces people into two parties, but when only one person can be elected to a seat, and is chosen by winning the PLURALITY, candidates shift to the center to attract as many votes as possible, and voters vote tactically to ward of greater evils. These forces push toward a two-party system, and in the U.S., it is not only entrenched, but corrupt.

    No newer or emerging democracy chooses this system. It remains a feature of more established democracies, mostly in the U.K., its commonwealth, and former colonies. Though even Australia and New Zealand have now modified their electoral systems, resulting in the viability of other parties as well. Most systems now incorporate some form of proportional representation, whereby each party is given a number of seats proportional to the percentage of votes it gets, largely stemming the idea of outright winners and losers. In New Zealand's most recent elections, the center-right National Party won the plurality of the nationwide vote, but the Labour, Green and NZF Parties had a majority when combined together, so the latter three formed a government themselves, and the NZ Prime Minister is from Labour.

    If we want to make new parties viable in the U.S., we will have to change the electoral system. This will have to start locally, at municipal governments, and reach its way to the states. The system that has the most steam at the moment is Instant Runoff, a.k.a. Ranked Choice Voting, where only one candidate wins, but must achieve a majority. It is achieved by allowing voters to rank candidates as their 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc, choices. If no candidate has a majority of 1st choice votes, the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated, and votes are redistributed from him to his voters' 2nd choices. The process continues until a candidate has a majority. The system, naturally, is vehemently opposed by the Democrats and Republicans. It actually passed in a statewide referendum in Maine, but the legislature used a maneuver to prevent it from being used. The voters are organizing again to hold another referendum to undo the legislature's action.

    I have little hope left, personally, for American democracy. I have participated since my teen years in politics, even professionally as an adult, and watched the system become more and more corrupt each year. We shall see, I suppose.
    -Caryn Bare

    1. this outdated electoral college is making things even worse whereby the central red states have a much greater say than they ought to. If you are going to try and balance things then take away some of these votes from the small states or do away with it altogether...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…