Skip to main content

the mind boggles

Alabama voted for Doug Jones but he didn’t win because of the white vote. In that sense, the state is still very much a backwater for racism, transphobia and homophobia. Someone as reprehensible as Roy Moore was still able to get most of the white vote and you must ask yourself how much more of a bottom feeder he would need to have been to lose among this demographic.

It was the black voters who voted overwhelmingly for Jones who was a far more credible and decent candidate.

Alabama is also among the poorest places in the industrialized world which makes you wonder why people continue to vote against their own interests by supporting a party that favors the wealthy. But then again evangelicals seem to care more about hating people who are different than helping their state become less of a banana republic.

The mind boggles.


Comments

  1. 96% of black voters (who represented roughly 30% of the vote) voted for Doug Jones. This is a huge win for blacks in Alabama and elsewhere. It's undeniable proof that their lives and votes matter. Perhaps now, for example, if Trump were running for president they would rise up as we needed them to defeat that fool.

    That said, 45% of white women college-educated voters cast their ballots in favor of Roy Moore. When I consider the very high percentage of women who have been sexually violated in their lives I find this astonishing. But then again I suppose I shouldn't be surprised as we saw similar numbers in the presidential election even after the Access Hollywood tape and women coming out with their experiences with Trump.

    The good news takeaway from this election is that all US citizens are witnessing what really can and does happen when they choose to sit out the vote. The tide is shifting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Evangelical preachers are among the wealthy, and spreading hate is profitable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you're ever inclined to travel to Alabama, or other places in the American south, outside major metropolitan areas, you're likely to find the following:

    Very little is available in terms of news media besides right wing propaganda, such as FOX and talk radio, which just saturates the airwaves. In many impoverished places, internet is not easy to come by, and even where it is, the people have long been indoctrinated against alternative viewpoints, with the right wing propaganda having been so forceful since the late 1980s.

    Infused with the culture's version of Christianity is the notion that if one is poor, it is one's fault. God looks unfavorably on remaining in poverty. One must overcome it by pulling oneself up by one's bootstraps. Those who cannot do this are either morally depraved - OR - have had all their god given opportunities taken from them by forces of evil, such as minorities, liberals and socialists.

    They see Democrats as demons - people who tempt with promises of better lives at the expense of everything holy. They might not have much, but what they do have is imperiled by Democrats. Republicans might favor the rich, but then, the rich are rich because they have earned it. Southern white voters want the chance to earn it, if only the forces of evil would get out of their way. The only people they think will help them are righteous Republicans.

    And those are the decent right wing voters. Pepper in the ones who truly pine for the olden days Dixie - slavery, lynchings, etc. - and you can see what liberal southerners are up against.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good points, thank you. I wasn't aware of this situation but it makes sense. I expect that the Democrats will be campaigning about the Alabama situation and success heavily in upcoming elections. There was never a worse time to remain complacent. Everyone must vote.

      Delete
  4. No I love the comments Emma its just going to be an uphill battle!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…