Skip to main content

the intelligent design

There are two distinct suppositions we can make about the nature of our existence:

A) Everything comes from nothing
B) Everything comes from something

Dedicated atheists will tell you that A is positively correct and they might try and take you back to some big bang which still needed some sort of fuel to happen. Even a spontaneous chemical reaction requires explaining as to where that gaseous cloud originated.

The reason I pick B is because it is the more logical of the two statements. After all, every process we observe in the universe has a beginning and an end; whether that be the creation of a baby, a rose or a diamond. It is what observe everyday in nature.

The additional problem with option A is that it hinges on the presumption that as limited flesh and bones creatures, additionally saddled with massive biases and blinders, we can comprehend the vast intelligence behind creation. This is not possible because our brains (sophisticated though they may be) cannot come to a resolution on such a hugely complex undertaking. Hence the only possible logical position left is agnosticism; i.e. to harbour doubt until things can be proven or disproven.

The fact is that the existence of God cannot be proven or disproven and to state otherwise is to be disingenuous. However, I prefer to observe that what I see all around me involves vast intelligence. Call it intelligent design if you will by some force or entity I cannot explain or conceive of.

As for the intelligence of some so called "religious" people, well that is another matter altogether.

Happy Easter.


Comments

  1. Your approach to intelligent design makes sense to me. I have slowly been evolving away from Darwin's theory towards the concept of intelligent design. You may want to take a look at Ann Coulter's book "Godless" for an excellent discussion on the subject. You may be surprised at how close you and Ann agree on this point.
    Pat

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pat its probably the only thing her and I have in common :)

      Delete
    2. Darwin can still work because evaluation on a micro scale certainly fits the model of intelligent design. Darwin himself was a theist by the way and had no problems combining what he observed with his beliefs

      Delete
    3. We come from an era and educational system where Darwin's theory was taught as an assumed fact. Deep thought or analysis, as I presume you have applied to what Darwin wrote, will show that there are multiple flaws in his theory and that upon analysis what is being taught in the schools as Darwin's theory of evolution needs to be reevaluated.
      Pat

      Delete
    4. In the Origin of the Species Darwin writes: "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone circling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved"...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

another coming out

Recently I had lunch with one of the young estimators who occasionally works with me here in Toronto. We were chatting about work and our respective lives when she queried about my love life:

“So how is it going on that front. Meet anyone interesting lately?”

I reflected for a moment and then said:

“My situation is a little particular and if you don’t mind I can share something about myself”

She leaned in a bit and told me to please go ahead.

“I am trans” I said matter of factly.

She looked at me and smiled and said:

“Really? That’s so neat”

She is 35 years old and a lovely person which is why I knew I could confide in her. I then added that I had been reflecting on whether I would switch companies and begin working as Joanna and although she is totally open she also knows how conservative our business can be. So I told her that if I did decide to it would definitely be under a different umbrella.

Then yesterday I was coming back to my place and the lady who rents it to me, who is abo…

feeling sexy

Here are the results of a recent survey of genetic women:

“A new hairdo, walking in heels and a glowing tan are among the things that make a woman feel sexy. Freshly applied lipstick, newly-shaved legs and a little black dress also have a positive effect on the psyche”

Are you surprised? I’m not because it is exactly the same list that makes transgender women feel sexy.

For a long time the idea was pandered about that transsexualism was rooted exclusively in aberrant sexuality. But of course you cannot separate the sexuality from the individual because that forms part of their overall makeup and the fact that genetic and transsexual women overlap here surprises no one.

We should also add here that women aren't always thinking about sex and neither are transgender women.

Pre transition transsexuals would not readily admit they found these things sexy because they were afraid to be seen as perverted men in front of gatekeepers who understood nothing about their condition.

Today we kn…