Skip to main content

correlation and causation

"Some pre transition male to female transsexuals experience cross gender arousal ergo the arousal causes a false claim of identity" This is the bedrock claim made by the apostles of the Autogynephilia theory.

An analogy which could be made would be:"every time I see lightning I hear thunder ergo lightning causes thunder" a claim which is incorrect for at best they are correlated (you can look that up).

You see, correlation is not necessarily causation. This is science 101.

Lack of proof is the problem with AGP and the only way to settle things would be to provide a definite explanation and causation for the arousal; something which no one has been able to do thus far. Therefore it is just as convenient for we transgender people to claim that cross gender arousal is a symptom of dysphoria: a statement which is just as plausible and far more likely given our early childhood identification.

To state that the Autogynephilia theory is based on science is clearly incorrect and to continue to promote it on that basis is disingenuous. You don't need to be a deep thinker or a Rhodes scholar to figure this out; it's actually quite elementary.

Proponents of the theory all have their very well documented individual agendas which I have featured here before in these pages and it still shows up in some of their sites presented as fact. The only thing that is a fact is that the arousal occurs.

This discredited theory will die with them because it is not picking up any steam in the form of new converts. Young transgender millenials are simply and rightly brushing it off and gatekeepers and researchers are abandoning it as well.

Transgender women like Julia Serano have fought hard against it as I once did because clearly we were both once stigmatized by what at first might have seemed like an explanation for our way of being. But now that it's been debunked all the fascination has gone out of it like air out of a balloon; at least it has for me.

By the way, one of the best and most passionate essays on this subject has been written by Clare Flourish. You can find it here.

Comments

  1. This word keeps appearing like a migraine headache!

    Humans are weird and unfathomable with infinite ways to be stimulated, or not. Did I mention infinite?

    We exist and no weirdo theories can make us go away...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It will be a long while before I bring it up again Caroline fear not. Just my way of closing the coffin 😁

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…