Skip to main content

the risk of implosion

Most societies will be facing problems of what to do about disappearing jobs. As technology and outsourcing continue to remove blue collar work that people can live on from the landscape, there will be more of them not being able to support themselves on meager wages.

The problem is particularly marked in the United States where misguided economic policies have resulted in half of the country’s population joining the ranks of the working poor. Some toil working two jobs to make ends meet just to keep a roof over their head and some basic sustenance with little to no disposable income to splurge on personal desires. This is in part the result of neoliberalist principles applied on a global scale.

Immigrants now work in the agricultural fields to pick crops or in fast food kitchens doing much of the low wage work that Americans don’t want but those who are choosy are also feeling the pinch as there aren’t enough white-collar jobs to go around. It may sound unfair to say, but not everyone is equally suited to perform jobs that require an elevated level of skill and those who show the most predisposition will claim them.

More economists are now proposing the idea of basic income because it could help with the problem of declining employment. The idea is that you provide the bare necessities of life and if the person desires to supplement them then they can but at least they won’t fall off the grid and end up on government assistance anyway except now with potentially aggravated health issues. Some of that money will need to come from the 1% and, as much as people still want to believe in this fable, there is no such thing as trickle-down economics because corporations are not human beings. They don’t have a social conscience. Some corporate leaders do have a policy where their workers are compensated fairly and even have shares in the company, but these instances are rare. Instead you often have the Walmart models where a menial wage is paid and the employee is sometimes forced to work another job to get by.

America will resist the Northern European liberal democracy models because they see that as government having too big a hand in running the economy, but the reality is that the degree of happiness of the general population of these countries far exceeds that of the United States; unless of course you belong to the American 1%. Its not rocket science to see why these models work: there is a more equitable distribution of wealth and no, these are not communist states.

The US will be forced to act however because as economic disparity worsens, and more people fall to the ranks of the working poor, the danger of societal implosion and revolt will only increase.

Take note that unemployment figures mean nothing here because if someone is employed at $20k a year it doesn't get reflected in disparity numbers. It just shows they have a job and so does that CEO making 10 million a year. It is the gap in income that is important and that has never been worse. It is not a sustainable scenario.

The entire global economy will need to be remade so that we can have a more stable and healthy world population; one that is as free from war as possible.

If you read the principles of Adam Smith who was arguably the father of American economics you will note that he believed in free market capitalism but under the umbrage of social responsibility and not unfettered the way it is today. In his book "The Wealth of Nations" he states:

“It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.”

"No society can surely be flourishing and happy of which by far the greater part of the numbers are poor and miserable. ”

No kidding Sherlock.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…