Skip to main content

another analogy

Science is based on facts backed up with concrete and experimentally verifiable evidence.

The Autogynephilia theory states that the presence of arousal to their own image as females in gender dysphoric men is the main cause of their desire to transition. The problem is that I could just as easily counteract this proposal by saying that the presence of arousal is part and parcel of a bigger and more complex picture and instantly arrive at a stalemate because no further evidence could be put forth substantiating the original claim.

Further complicating matters is that not everyone who experiences arousal chooses or even desires transition. Remember that its not whether the arousal is there or not but more about attributing your entire motivation to it.

Allow me to illustrate with an analogy:

Suppose you associated rain with directly being the cause of lightning and thunder. After all we frequently see them together and could be forgiven for assuming a direct causal correlation. In actual fact we know they are often accompanying elements of a complex equation that happens in the atmosphere. We know that we often have lightning and thunder with rain but we also know that rain can exist without either. In rare cases you can have lightning and thunder without any accompanying rain.

See the point?

In a great leap, Blanchard has made a direct cause and effect correlation between two things in an area where we have even less scientific information than in the field of meteorology and added insult to injury by basing his conclusion exclusively on interviews where the masturbatory habits of pre-transition transsexuals were thoroughly documented and scrutinized.

When was the last time you heard about conclusive scientific findings being based on interviews? If by now I have not succeeded in putting doubts in your mind about this theory being scientific then probably nothing will.

In reality, the only way to prove such a theory would be to have a clear and exact understanding of the nature of transvestism, transsexualism and how they directly overlap with sexuality. A tall order if I ever saw one.

I know I focus a lot on this issue but its because of all the harm that Blanchard has caused people who were already hurting and needed support. Instead he has provided a level of judgment and derision not normally associated with an academic researcher.

Gender dysphoria is not a problem of misdirected sexuality but a problem of gender identity and sexuality becoming re-arranged in a way that we do not yet comprehend.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…