Skip to main content

through simple deduction

Using nothing more than simple deduction one can arrive at the conclusion that gender dysphoria is positively real. How do I know this? I need only observe biology and the natural world's inner workings.

Reflect on an area in our natural world without any anomalies and you will genuinely hard pressed to think of any. Eventually you will arrive at the inevitable conclusion that perfection and uniformity are not possible. So why would sexual and gender identity be the only areas untouched by this variability? It would be possible to predict on that basis alone that people like us exist even if one had never met or heard of the concept of transgender or transsexual individuals.

Those who read my blog know that I am absolutely sold on the idea of gender identity as a continuum. You have intersex people who identify as one gender or the other or both and they are easier to believe since they carry the physical signs of difference but what is inside the brain is not as simple to diagnose.

You have male bodied people who identify as female and female bodied who identify as male with no detectable signs other than their own insistence. But even then the predictability of anomalies found elsewhere should bolster our conviction that transgender people are not making things up.

Therefore we can take solace in the fact that we are part of wonderful tapestry of variability that is found in this strange and magical universe.


Comments

  1. If I might humbly call upon your considerable powers of deduction, how would you explain a 930% increase in gender identity referrals to the NHS in the UK? Could it be that something completely off the radar screen is causing more and more and more gender identify issues?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kati I would chalk that up to people coming out of the wordwork and finally having the courage to address their gender issues. Most of us have lived in the shadows for many years and some will take the steps they have always wanted to. This new era of openness is what is creating this environment.

      The danger of course is that some of these individuals may not be the best candidates and may regret their decision.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…