Skip to main content

"the real me"

Many transgender people use the phrase “the real me” when they are presenting as a female and it almost always makes me pause and ask the question whether they think they are being inauthentic when they are presenting as male.

I don’t see my male persona as not being genuine but rather part and parcel of who I am. I see myself as embodying both male and female animas that contribute to making up my entire persona.

I can understand why so many feel this way but it can perhaps contribute to reinforcing the notion that their male identity is somehow worthless. I suppose if you are intending to fully transition then maybe that is why this idea can become a permanent fixture in our minds.

Some transgender people (and I count myself among them) take the two spirit approach. We can celebrate both sides of the same coin.

Do you necessarily need to choose a side? this is a decision which is directly linked to the strength and tenacity of your dysphoria. Certainly at the upper echelon of the Benjamin scale transition is not a choice but a necessity.

Test the waters and see how far is good enough for you. Measured steps are the best way to slowly and organically achieve a balance that need not necessarily involve destroying your male identity.


Comments

  1. Hi Joanna,
    Interesting thought.
    I've never really felt 'authentic'in either role. As Susie it's a very conscious acting out, but even as a male I'm very aware that I don't seem to think or feel the same way that other males do, and therefore my male persona is also to a large part a self-conscious projection of how I feel I am expected to act and behave, at work or in social situations. (Unless they all secretly feel the same as well, and we are all acting out an expected male stereotype. Which would be both funny and a little sad.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Susie I have often reflected on how much of our exterior behavior is governed by social convention and how much by genuine internal impetus. There is do much that overlaps between men and women and the differences not as large as we think

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would also add that authenticity for you likely resides in between both which is why you don't feel perfectly at ease in either mode. I have found this to be true for me at times. So much of the machinations we go through are based on learned behavior that it is hard to know what is the genuine "us" at times.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…