Skip to main content

something smells rotten

Breibart News editor Milo Yiannopoulos is irreverent and funny but he is also dangerous. He is disarmingly witty, unabashedly and flamboyantly gay and yet is strongly white nationalist, Catholic, anti-feminist and pro-Trump. He is also hard to pin down and uses humor as a way to disarm and avoid being cornered.

Watch how Bill Maher tries and then grudgingly finally agrees to disagree. Kudos to Bill for having him on regardless.

Like many in the alt-right they don't come out at you as blatant racists but instead spin things around to say that the political correctness has gone to far and that white people shouldn't be made to be apologists for the suppression of other races.

Milo is smart and dodges questions with jokes but just watch one of his talks and how he puts people in their place when they criticize him and his platform.

Like Steve Bannon and Richard Spencer they form part of a dangerous movement that tries to wrap white nationalism in a another guise only that at the end of the day you can only use so much air freshener to no avail on the smell of rotten fish.

Comments

  1. No Kusos from me. I like Bill Maher, and generally enjoy his irreverence. But his defense of shtick compels him to give a pass to anyone whose tone is jocular, no matter the contest or underlying purpose for the delivery. I'm sure school yard bullies get in some witty zingers on their victims; no need to defend such "comedy."

    Maher enjoys his position as an iconoclast, and went out of his way to treat Milo as but a fellow comedian with whom he has minor disagreements. He treats Ann Coulterr the same way. He seems even to find Kellyamne Conway hilarious.

    And, as usual, when these vile provocateurs go after the trans community, Maher is all-too-happy to join. Watch the after-show clip. Milo says that he doesn't want confused men who think they're women in the bathroom with little girls, and Maher says that's reasonable. Milo says that trans women disproportionately commit sex crimes, and Maher doesn't question it. He instead, turns to the other panelists, and asks what they think of "weirdos" going to the bathroom.

    The other panelists included two African Americans, both of whom got so fed up with Milo that they told him to "f*ck off." whoch is another effect bullies and trolls like to have. To push decent people to the point of indecency so they can turn and point a disdainful finger back at them.

    Nah, no kudos to Bill. His point was to defend Milo as but a comedian unfairly targeted by people for harmless humor. That's not who Milo is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are correct that Milo is dangerous which is what I say but I think Maher is trying to give fair chance which is why he also invites the odious Anne Coulter. It often does not play well and here it's a disaster because Milo does not bite and play his usual foul self. He couldn't afford to.

      Delete
    2. To Whatever, yeah's point, here's a link to an article on NYT today: https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/02/18/us/ap-us-tv-maher-yiannopoulos.html?_r=0

      And a humorous quote: "...Yiannopoulos said that "the worst people on the far left and far right all hate me."

      Retorted Wilmore: "I think you're leaving out a lot of people."

      So true.

      Delete
    3. I must respectfully disagree here. I watched Maher. His goal was to defend Milo, and demonstrate that people who are offended by him are over sensitive whiny liberals.

      Delete
    4. You have a point whatever but I know that Maher tries to have guests on that vehemently disagree with him and admittedly having Milo on was pushing the envelope. I am not sure I would have handled him the same way mind you..

      Delete
    5. I had missed disgusting Milo's attack on trans people but will cover that in tomorrow's post....

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…