Skip to main content

the measuring stick

Jack Molay brought to my attention a paper written by Charles Moser on the topic of paraphilias called “Paraphilias and the ICD-11: Progress but Still Logically Inconsistent”.

In this paper, Dr. Moser examines some of the logic (or lack thereof) of labeling conditions as paraphilias while others are not. The Working Group on the Classification of Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health (WGSDSH) is charged with reviewing and recommending changes for categories related to sexuality in the International Classifications of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD), published by the World Health Organization (WHO). Moser then questions the distinguishing between what is and is not a paraphilia and the criteria used.

For example he states:

• What is the rationale for diagnosing individuals distressed about their ‘‘atypical’’ sexual arousal with a Paraphilic Disorder, but not to diagnose individuals who are distressed about their homosexual or bisexual sexual orientation?
• Are atypical sexual interests a sign of a mental disorder? One should remember that masturbation, homosexuality, heterosexual sodomy, and non marital sex were once seen as atypical and as evidence of a mental disorder.

More from the paper:

“There are some basic tenets of the ICD which seem to have been lost: Medicine is based on science; researchers and clinicians should acknowledge and try to minimize their biases; the patient—not society—is our focus; and we strive to apply the diagnosis of a mental disorder consistently, despite our own possible distaste for any associated behaviors. In the age of evidence-based medicine, we do not create diagnoses because experts, the lay public, or our political leaders think we should. We try to anticipate how these diagnoses can be misused and take steps to prevent that misuse. Although Krueger et al. (2017) appear to understand these challenges, their proposals do very little to prevent the misuse or abuse of these diagnoses. The leadership of WHO and the ICD-11 should demand answers to the questions above and clarify the purpose of including these diagnoses before codifying them in ICD-11.

The conflation of mental disorders and crimes is a human rights issue. People with paraphilias and Paraphilic Disorder diagnoses throughout the world experience major violations of their civil, cultural, economic, political, and social rights. We cannot protect their rights if we act as agents of social control or confuse crimes and moral beliefs with mental disorders. To be crystal clear, the preceding comments should not be construed as supportive of any sexual activity involving no consenting individuals or those incapables of consenting. Any interpretation of my comments as supporting the decriminalization of nonconsensual sexual interactions is misguided and wrong.”


We must remember that although LGBT people are not mentally ill every effort was made in the past to convince the public that they were. Moser’s point is that we avoid the use a subjective compass to establish guidelines as to what is abnormal and attempt to serve the cause of justice to people who fall outside of the boundaries of the majority.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322215673_Paraphilias_and_the_ICD-11_Progress_but_Still_Logically_Inconsistent

Image result for measuring stick

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


more thoughts on cross gender arousal

I have been reflecting for many years on how cross gender arousal originates.

Firstly, the transgender child has already exhibited (or hidden) some gender variance for several years before they arrive at puberty (I wasn't older than 4 when scolded for wearing my mother's shoes). But when they hit puberty a dilemma occurs: the object of the sexual attraction is also someone whose gender they identify with either fully or partly. This contradiction affects the imprinting of the sexual identity but it is not well described as target location error but rather as a pull in two separate directions which leaves the gynephilic adolescent facing two distinct paths. I was keenly aware of this problem but wanted to be normal so I suppressed the dysphoric feelings as hard as I could. I wasn't attracted to my own image as a woman but rather to the idea of being a desirable woman as well as being with one. That juxtaposition fused to my gender core and I was left with a riddle to solve:…

my last post

This will be my last post.

When I wrote recently that this blog had another seven years of life in it I was trying to convince myself that it was true. It was in fact a little bit of self delusion.

With almost 3,000 posts to date I have accomplished what I set out to do which was to heal myself and in the process share some of the struggle I had been through with others on the chance they might find some value in my words. After seven years of writing, my life still isn't perfect; no one's is. But I have discovered a path forward completely free of the trappings which society would have had me adopt so I could fit in.

Over the last 25 years of my life I have turned over every stone I could find while exploring this topic and in the process realized that we haven't even begun to scratch the surface of this deeply complex subject. What I have ultimately learned is that my instincts have more value than what someone who isn't gender dysphoric writes about me. We are very …