Skip to main content

a long way to go back

History shows us that looking after the population in your own backyard is conducive towards keeping the social peace. We can look to examples such as the French and Russian revolutions, where justice was not served and revolt was an inevitable result. This typically happens when the populace has arrived at a critical junction where it feels there is no other alternative.

Thus, the lesson we should draw is that taking a short sided view where only a small portion of the people are content, to be a recipe for failure.

Unfortunately this is where the US is currently headed with GOP policies which enrich the 1% and nothing flows down to the rest. But even when centrist democratic governments are in power the result is much the same because they are just a less radical version of the Republicans minus the religious fruitcakes and outright racists.

Implosion is an ugly affair where you reach critical mass and that 1% can no longer rely on serfdom since those working stiffs cannot adequately sustain themselves. Unless the current policies change, the US may be headed for that precipice. This is something I deeply hope doesn't happen not only because we in Canada will be impacted but also because most Americans are decent and upstanding people.

The GOP in it's current incarnation is the most radical version of the party in that nation's history with bowed sycophants in the congress and senate all scared of a crass and thin-skinned halfwit who lives on Twitter. Still, it is not too late to turn the ship around and Mr. Mueller can probably help initiate that.

Rationality should tell us that the health of a nation is measured by its poorest citizens and by that metric there is a long way to come back up. Maybe it won't be a return to an FDR New Deal style era but hopefully at least it will be to a place where fairness isn't a dirty word.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


indoctrination

As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

let's please read carefully

This post is prompted by a recent comment I received to one of my older posts and I wanted to address it.

I used to wonder why some transgender people accepted Blanchard’s work until I think I figured out why: they may not have examined it closely enough. They would experience cross gender arousal and then accept it was Autogynephilia without properly understanding what the term meant and what the theory said: it is an invented sexual “illness” which makes people transition. In other words, it is the arousal itself which causes this desire and not a pre-existing gender identity which does not align with birth sex. Of course, Blanchard has no explanation for the origin of his proposed “illness” only that it is a form of sexual deviance.

My counter proposal? we transition despite this arousal. In other words, the transgender identity is pre-existing and the arousal is the result of the mismatching of burgeoning sexual feelings towards females and this misaligned identity; it is not per…