Skip to main content


I’m having trouble wrapping my head around something.

For us being transgender clearly isn’t a choice and yet the right is painting things as if we belonged exclusively to a social movement. Science isn’t on their side however and they could easily convince themselves of this by observing the variability in everything that is biological. No process in nature is untouched by variations and permutations and it makes no sense that this would be the only one exempt.

I am just using pure logic here. However, conservatives prefer not to think in these terms because it is damaging to their philosophy. If you allow for these possibilities it doesn’t bode well for their insistence that things are fine just the way they are, and we risk upsetting their apple cart of a society.

In a climate where right wing radicalism and science denying are on the rise, we can see how a rise in the visibility of trans people has produced a reactionary backlash to try and stomp out what is seen by some as pure heresy. It was fine when transgender people were not visible (either through being closeted or through under the radar transitions) but this putting on of a public face challenges the beliefs that they hold to be absolute and cannot be challenged.

There is going to be a huge disappointment for the right however, because today's young transgender people are not apt to hide, and they don’t see why they need to shelter society from their existence. That attitude is going to create an atmosphere where head on collisions are going to happen more often.

It is going to be a fight for the right to openly exist versus the wishes of the hopelessly ignorant to keep things status quo.

Image result for denial transgender


  1. Joanna, I agree with most of your points here and yet I don't understand what you're having trouble wrapping your mind around. The religious right and others are certainly crying fire in the theater as we trans people emerge from the shadows. But we've seen this play before with gays and lesbians starting, roughly, forty years ago. We don't necessarily know how the LGBTQ play is going to end but the trend seems to be clear, toward equality.

    1. I guess is how obtuse people can be when confronted with clear evidence Emma

    2. Well gee, there are so many examples of this!
      - climate change
      - overpopulation
      - the US/Mexico border wall
      - Any of Trump's "policies"


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

how times change

How times have changed.

Whereas transition was something not to even contemplate for us, here is a young trans person who felt the opposite pressure. She looks and sounds extremely passable but decided it wasn't for her despite the social media presence of young transitioners potentially inspiring her to.

We are all different and I happen to think she's rather a smart cookie as well...


As transgender people, organized religion hasn't really been our friend however on the other hand it has often had little to do with true spirituality. I needed to learn this over time and much of what I was taught growing up was steeped in the judgmental superstition of society instead of what some creator would demand of me.

Regardless of your belief system, you are a child of the universe and have been endowed with uniqueness and goodness of spirit. You have probably never wished anyone ill will and you have tried your best to live within the absurd coordinate system of humanity. Yet somehow belonging to the LGBT community was entirely your fault.

As I have grown older this inherent irrationality became increasingly evident to me. I knew I was a fundamentally good person and yet I was different in a way which was not of my choosing. Hence with this comprehension my self appreciation and esteem grew in proportion.

Religion for me today seems forever trapped in the misinterpretat…

more thoughts on cross gender arousal

I have been reflecting for many years on how cross gender arousal originates.

Firstly, the transgender child has already exhibited (or hidden) some gender variance for several years before they arrive at puberty (I wasn't older than 4 when scolded for wearing my mother's shoes). But when they hit puberty a dilemma occurs: the object of the sexual attraction is also someone whose gender they identify with either fully or partly. This contradiction affects the imprinting of the sexual identity but it is not well described as target location error but rather as a pull in two separate directions which leaves the gynephilic adolescent facing two distinct paths. I was keenly aware of this problem but wanted to be normal so I suppressed the dysphoric feelings as hard as I could. I wasn't attracted to my own image as a woman but rather to the idea of being a desirable woman as well as being with one. That juxtaposition fused to my gender core and I was left with a riddle to solve:…