Skip to main content

don't feed the animals

External signs of religion observance do perturb me but I will defend the right of another person to wear them. My issue has to do with placing undo emphasis on the wearing of objects as being indicative of religious fervor. I find it irrational and overly dogmatic and failing to do so should not be viewed quite so drastically. But that's just me.

I remember an incident told to me by an engineering colleague whereby a Sikh gentleman was visiting a plant and was forced to remove his turban to accommodate the hard hat. Upon his return the turban was nowhere to be found and he had to be calmed down until it was eventually found. Again, I am at a loss to explain what I view as irrational behavior over an object tied to such a level of orthodoxy that it defies logic.

I would feel the same way about a Catholic who would freak out about misplacing their St Chistopher medal. It's not about a specific religion.

But now my provincial government has instilled a law that prohibits the wearing of religious symbols for anyone working in public office. This means that police officers, fire fighters, passport officers and any form of civil servant who deals with the public will be prohibited from wearing them.

Ironically, the Christian cross will be allowed to remain hanging proudly in the government common chamber on the basis of the argument that, upon its founding, Quebec was an overwhelmingly Catholic society. This of course reaks of hypocrisy because you either eliminate all religious symbols or none at all.

Quebec is having the same kind of challenge as much of the Western world in its assimilation of immigrants who are not of Christian heritage and form part of a visible minority. The world is increasingly becoming more mixed and the clash of cultures and religions is being felt everywhere.

However, irrespective of our biases (and I consider my own objection one of them) we should refrain from discriminating. Let people wear what they want; it's a free country.

Otherwise we risk feeding the alt-right crazies and their fascist tendencies which fit ever so nicely into the Trump base of loonies in the US.


  1. Of course your position comes from your own Christian based society, within the Christian tradition outward signs of faith are at most discretionary (for those not part of an order, or ordained into ministry) indeed if we read the Gospels we find that Christ disapproved of any outward displays of faith. However in some other faiths it is an article of their faith and it's practise that certain observances of clothing are honoured. To disallow this is to exclude certain groups from public service and is discriminatory. In many Countries, including the UK such a ban would be illegal.

    1. Exactly and it should be but our premier is trying which is unfortunate


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

One transgender woman's take on AGP

This entry from the transhealth website dates back to 2001 and it offers a very nice dissection of the now mostly debunked but still controversial AGP theory and how this transgender woman could care two cents about it. People who have been trying to marginalize the experience of gynephilic transwomen have pushed for the stigmatizing idea that they are actually perverted men. Well this soul, who couldn't give a hoot either way, isn't buying any of it and her frankness at times had me chuckling to myself as I read her posting. If we ever met I would give her a hug for seeing through the BS but mostly for being herself: "About a year ago I was reading on Dr. Anne Lawrence’s site about a new theory of the origin of trans called “autogynephilia.” This theory asserts that many trans women—and transsexual women in particular—desire reassignment surgery because they are eroticizing the feminization of their bodies. The first thing that struck me about it, of course, was t

my last post

This will be my last blog post. When I wrote recently that this blog had another seven years of life in it I was trying to convince myself that it was true. It was in fact a little bit of self delusion. With almost 3,000 posts to date I have accomplished what I set out to do which was to heal myself and in the process share some of the struggle I had been through with others on the chance they might find some value in my words. After seven years of writing, my life still isn't perfect; no one's is. But I have discovered a path forward completely free of the trappings which society would have had me adopt so I could fit in. Over the last 25 years of my life I have turned over every stone I could find while exploring this topic and in the process realized that we haven't even begun to scratch the surface of this deeply complex subject. What I have ultimately learned is that my instincts have more value than what someone who isn't gender dysphoric writes about me. We

Never Say Never....

 I was certain that I would never post here again and yet, here I am. It’s been several years, and life has changed me yet again. I have burrowed further into my psyche to discover more internal truths about myself all in the silence of a life lived with more periods of reflective solitude than ever before. After attempting for many years to be a problem solver for others, I needed to dig deeply to discover who I was, which should be a necessity for all people and an absolute imperative for those of us who dare rub against the grain of conventional society. The most important thing we can do for ourselves is honor the internal voice which has driven us since childhood. That whisper which we were compelled to ignore through our initial indoctrination must be listened to again for guidance. I knew I had spent too long heeding messaging that wasn’t working for me as a trans person, and it was time to stop. For the world gleefully basks in a level ignorance and hypocrisy we are not abl