Skip to main content

logic 101

Can anyone give me the answer please??!!


  1. Okay, I getcha :) Logic 101.

    If P then Q.
    Not Q.
    Therefore P.

    Modus Tollens. Valid.

    BUT . . . . . also Logic 101 - Valid does not equal True.

    First, Mueller's actual "P" statement is, "If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime,"

    The "Q" statement on the cartoon chalkboard is implied, but, it was qualified with, "We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime."

    So, let's take the actual statement:

    IF P (we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime) THEN Q (we would have said so).

    So, let's imply Q, because indeed, he didn't say so. Thus, P is true. Meaning Mueller's team does not have confidence that the president committed a crime.

    And take the qualification too: His team *did not make any* determination as to whether the president *did commit* a crime.

    This is just the same thing he has said in his report, and the same thing he has been at pains to explain since Liar General Barr lied about what was in the report.

    People really need to think this through: If you are on an American criminal jury, the Prosecution bears the burden of proving to you beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant is guilty. You will have two options: "GUILTY" or "NOT GUILTY." There is another option, but you won't have it, and that would be "INNOCENT."

    Mueller was working with a different choice. He believes that he cannot indict a sitting president, and thus, he wants his report reviewed by the House for review for impeachment. Because the House of Representatives has the authority to prosecute the president for crimes, Mueller himself was working with the following choices: "NOT GUILTY" or "NOT NOT GUILTY." The option not on the table for him was "GUILTY." Mueller's verdict was NOT NOT GUILTY.

    Meaning the House should impeach this criminal in the White House and they hardly need the Mueller Report to do it. They're just not going to for political reasons, giving the criminal a win, stupidly, stubbornly, wrongly, and for Democrats, characteristically arguing that impeaching him would be giving him the win.

    In his statement, he negates Q by saying, "We did not however, make a determination as to whether the president

    1. Apologies for that last line. Thought I'd erased it. Anyway, the House should, right now, begin impeachment proceedings. For Barr and for Trump. They don't even need to vote on it now. They can wait until after the election to take the vote. Just get up there every day and make your case. That's what the Republicans did to Clinton, and they didn't care that the Senate was unlikely to convict. While the majority of the people at that time thought the impeachment was improper, Clinton's vice president ran for president after him and managed to lose to the imbecile son of the president Clinton ousted. Yes, I realize that Florida was rigged, and the Supreme Court installed the imbecile son by stopping the recount, but Gore should have run away with that election handily. It should not have been that close, period. But it was. Because, the Republicans are hired to be the Harlem Globetrotters and the Democrats are hired to be the Washington Generals.

      Start the impeachment proceedings! It will not help the orange buffoon in the White House to have news every day about his impeachment and the case being made against him. It will rally his cult, but so what. They're not in play, and they're not sitting it out anyway. It's the left that needs to be rallied, and the Establishment wants the left demoralized. Because the awful truth is that, to the Establishment Democrats, TRUMP IS THE LESSER EVIL THAN A LEFT-WING PRESIDENT.

    2. That last bit is completely true Caryn. The establishment Dems are far more scared of the progressives taking over because that really soils their party of big corporate money and they cant have that. That's why they play the line of "if we impeach then we risk losing in 2020". Still, impeachment will stall in the Senate because of hacks like McConnel and Graham who have vowed to quash. It doesn't get you impeachment but it is the moral and right thing to do. If you do not attempt it you weakness which is far worse.
      Biden is the wrong horse and he will lose to the orange but let them try anyway. They will never learn...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

One transgender woman's take on AGP

This entry from the transhealth website dates back to 2001 and it offers a very nice dissection of the now mostly debunked but still controversial AGP theory and how this transgender woman could care two cents about it. People who have been trying to marginalize the experience of gynephilic transwomen have pushed for the stigmatizing idea that they are actually perverted men. Well this soul, who couldn't give a hoot either way, isn't buying any of it and her frankness at times had me chuckling to myself as I read her posting. If we ever met I would give her a hug for seeing through the BS but mostly for being herself: "About a year ago I was reading on Dr. Anne Lawrence’s site about a new theory of the origin of trans called “autogynephilia.” This theory asserts that many trans women—and transsexual women in particular—desire reassignment surgery because they are eroticizing the feminization of their bodies. The first thing that struck me about it, of course, was t

my last post

This will be my last blog post. When I wrote recently that this blog had another seven years of life in it I was trying to convince myself that it was true. It was in fact a little bit of self delusion. With almost 3,000 posts to date I have accomplished what I set out to do which was to heal myself and in the process share some of the struggle I had been through with others on the chance they might find some value in my words. After seven years of writing, my life still isn't perfect; no one's is. But I have discovered a path forward completely free of the trappings which society would have had me adopt so I could fit in. Over the last 25 years of my life I have turned over every stone I could find while exploring this topic and in the process realized that we haven't even begun to scratch the surface of this deeply complex subject. What I have ultimately learned is that my instincts have more value than what someone who isn't gender dysphoric writes about me. We

Never Say Never....

 I was certain that I would never post here again and yet, here I am. It’s been several years, and life has changed me yet again. I have burrowed further into my psyche to discover more internal truths about myself all in the silence of a life lived with more periods of reflective solitude than ever before. After attempting for many years to be a problem solver for others, I needed to dig deeply to discover who I was, which should be a necessity for all people and an absolute imperative for those of us who dare rub against the grain of conventional society. The most important thing we can do for ourselves is honor the internal voice which has driven us since childhood. That whisper which we were compelled to ignore through our initial indoctrination must be listened to again for guidance. I knew I had spent too long heeding messaging that wasn’t working for me as a trans person, and it was time to stop. For the world gleefully basks in a level ignorance and hypocrisy we are not abl