Some very interesting questions

I found this entry on Jack Molay's Crossdreamer portal (dated January 2022) where some of the very same interesting questions which I ponder were being discussed (for example I don't believe that expression and identity are necessarily synonymous) :

"Over at CDL Carah Maise asks whether it makes sense to include people who have a different gender expression (as opposed to gender identity) in the transgender family.

She writes:

I've been around the trans world for what is becoming a very long time. I've seen things evolve and change. I’m seeing, a growing call for gender nonconformity and expression (whether for crossdressing, drag, fashion, etc) to move from just being under the trans umbrella but a call to be considered the same thing as transgender, regardless of actual gender identity/dysphoria. Beyond what we have classically seeing requiring at least an identity of not cis. Much of this comes from a very sincere place and is motivated by good. However something about this makes me feel just a little uncomfortable, probably that I've been accused and denied a trans identity by cis people. 

This intro leads to a lot of interesting questions:

  • Are gender expression and gender identity really two completely distinct phenomena?
  • How do you deal with the fact that many transgender people are on a journey, where their self understanding changes?
  • Do we have the science needed to determine who are trans and who are not?
  • Who is the arbiter, given that no one else but the trans person themselves can truly know who they are?
  • Is being transgender a question about some kind of gender essence or is this a relative political or social term, defined by the way cis people treat trans people.
  • If trans is defined as the opposite of cis, and cis are seen as those who are not trans, can the term be anything but relative?"


Popular posts from this blog


Language matters

One last thing remains